Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

62% Positive

Analyzed from 2694 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#turk#mechanical#tasks#down#task#data#going#mturk#enough#humans

Discussion (116 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

donalhuntabout 1 hour ago
Worth noting that one of the most high profile uses of Mechanical Turk was in September 2007 to review satellite imagery in a massive crowdsourced effort to find missing record-setting aviator Steve Fossett.

The effort failed to find any areas of interest and the missing aviator was found the following year by a hiker. I wonder if there was any analysis after the fact to understand if the imagery actually provided any hints regarding the eventual crash site.

nlkingthreeabout 1 hour ago
I wonder whether AI would have found the aviator.
madroxabout 12 hours ago
Mechanical Turk had a good run, but not surprised it's shutting down. I'm sure the platform was getting flooded with people doing task arbitrage and using lots of AI anyway.

I believe the issue is that this can no longer be a horizontal play. MTurk was mostly for unskilled tasks...the kind AI can do well enough that it isn't worth the cost differential to verify it or keep farmed to humans. The "trust but verify" AI output is now the kind that requires domain expertise. This is what most full stack AI companies are bringing to industries.

Curious if this kind of work will come around again one day or was just a moment in time. If it does I'm sure it will be specifically about generating training data.

johnsmith1840about 12 hours ago
I think yes but on different categories. First one I imagine is robotics control and support.

"This robot is having trouble folding a tshirt help it out for 1$"

Unless they go the waymo route of highly trusted people but I think mass deployed robots are a bit safer than a car for this.

georgefrownyabout 2 hours ago
Giving out control of industrial machinery that interacts in the human environment without the physical interlocks (i.e. humanoid robots in a house) to random internet people seems like a problem.

I can imagine a carefully orchestrated plot to assassinate someone by having an embedded agent in the task delegation pool command the laundry bot to punch the target's head off their shoulders.

dividedbyzeroabout 2 hours ago
Giving out control of such things to LLMs is already complete madness, so once the first pleasure bot powered by Grok has dismembered a few thousand users, they'll get sophisticated safety mechanisms.

Though like as not you're still going to be right, after all, Stuxnet happened.

madroxabout 11 hours ago
This is what I meant by full stack AI companies. I don't think you could get humans into the loop fast enough if they didn't have some idea of the type of task involved. I don't want people to be asked to fold a tshirt one moment and do a difficult traffic merge the next.
its-summertimeabout 10 hours ago
There is training systems and validation of skills in mturk iirc: for tshirt folding, you'd be given fake setups to be able to get used to controlling the robot, if you can't do it, you won't ever get assignments to do it. For traffic overrides, you'd be tested on having correct knowledge, and once again given supervised tasks to show you can actually be trusted (and there would be safety systems, elevating tasks that can't be performed at your level to people who can, etc)

The worker needs to do a bunch to opt into any given work group, which makes the (lack of) payments extremely unreasonable on top of everything else

inigyouabout 7 hours ago
It doesn't really matter what you want though, only what CEOs want and that's low costs. I can see a combined shirt folding/traffic merging platform taking off.
ntauthorityabout 11 hours ago
warioware shows it can be fun though but i'd indeed not like to see that applied to safety-critical tasks
mike_hearnabout 4 hours ago
There are already robotics models that can fold shirts and similar just fine. Progress in VLA models is good, I don't think this would form the foundation of a business. Humanoid robots are going to be another ChatGPT, it's going to seem to happen almost overnight because people aren't paying attention to the underlying research papers.
simslaabout 3 hours ago
Any papers you'd recommend?
vidarhabout 6 hours ago
There are already a number of companies providing RLHF and SFT services for AI providers that does a lot of validation/prequalification of people that'd be well placed to take on tasks like that, but the big problem to solve would be latency if you don't have people contracted to carry out a task right now.
mikestorrentabout 11 hours ago
That's a remarkable idea. It could be heavily gamified, it could train models, and it might actually be mentally stimulating since you'd be facing different situations all the time.

Except, I'm a grown adult and I can't fold a t-shirt properly

madroxabout 11 hours ago
It could require listing your credentials to get you the proper tasks: doctor, lawyer, or tshirt folder
Yokohiiiabout 9 hours ago
It is weird because the last time I've heard about MTurk was about developing countries being rather reliant on it for doing AI grunt work. If am not totally wrong this must mean that the data work has moved to other services.
toygabout 4 hours ago
Probably AI models got good enough to bootstrap their own training systems.
SV_BubbleTimeabout 8 hours ago
> task arbitrage and using lots of AI anyway.

Oh, I remember UpWork.

shuwixabout 4 hours ago
Oh ... upwork ... put offer, get 50 replies from people which jump for every penny without even being able to understand the task.
raverbashingabout 6 hours ago
"Fun" fact, they were also used by psychology/etc students when they need to do 'research' with X amount of people
timcobbabout 12 hours ago
How could it come around again?
Legend2440about 11 hours ago
There are like three dozen companies selling similar services for generating AI training data.
charlieyu1about 2 hours ago
Good data isn’t cheap and keeping it in-house gives you more control.
madroxabout 12 hours ago
I'm unsure. If it does, it will be work that is too expensive or inaccurate or regulatory for current AI methods. For example, you want a doctor to sign off on some AI output on a diagnosis.

However, I'm not sure a single platform will be how it emerges

x0xMaximusabout 12 hours ago
As AMT's largest requester for the past 10 years, this news was relayed to requesters at the same time as respondents. It's also worth noting that our lead contact, the Sr Program Manager at AWS leading AMT, transitioned to Amazon Bedrock and SageMaker Model Evaluations a ~2-3 years ago.. Leaving behind essential zero team managing the project after they migrated over the stored value accounts to native AWS billing.
jan_Inkepaabout 12 hours ago
our of curiosity, can you say what your use of it was?
x0xMaximusabout 12 hours ago
Initially the annotation of biomedical literature (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25592589/) but left academia for commercial use where we transitioned to arbitrage the market research and ephemeral task markets. It was essentially a research panel with a underdeveloped UI for tasks.. so abstract away AMT's tooling so it can be used by any buyer in the ResTech, Political Polling and Data Annotation space

My favorite part of AMT is always going to be figuring out that if we only paid in $0.07 intervals, their commission algorithm would round down to the nearest whole cent when their 20% commission resulted in a fractional cent on the unit transaction level, not the monthly invoice level. Was ultimately worth it to have implemented https://git.generalresearch.com/panels/amt-jb/tree/jb/flow/a...

Nitionabout 8 hours ago
> Can you say what your use of it was?

> Initially the annotation of biomedical literature but left academia for commercial use where we transitioned to arbitrage the market research and ephemeral task markets. It was essentially a research panel with a underdeveloped UI for tasks.. so abstract away AMT's tooling so it can be used by any buyer in the ResTech, Political Polling and Data Annotation space.

Reading this is similar to how I feel when I've asked Claude about something it coded for me. As with Claude, I think I get it after reading it three times; you guys were a middleman that provided a simplified interface for Mechanical Turk?

swyxabout 11 hours ago
> My favorite part of AMT is always going to be figuring out that if we only paid in $0.07 intervals, their commission algorithm would round down to the nearest whole cent when their 20% commission resulted in a fractional cent on the unit transaction level, not the monthly invoice level.

can someone ELI5 because what in the office space

loremmabout 12 hours ago
I truly have no idea what this website is saying https://generalresearch.com/
m3rcabout 11 hours ago
What's up with the part of the website where you are talking about "neutralized foreign actors", was that also using contracted Mechanical Turk labor?
BobbyTables2about 9 hours ago
That’s top-tier “OfficeSpace” thinking there…
testbjjlabout 10 hours ago
Sounds like your program manager was smart and valuable to the company. Do you have any plans to replace the service/data provided by MTurk?
shortformblogabout 12 hours ago
So, I have a story to share about Mechanical Turk that you might find interesting. I’ve shared it a couple of times before on Twitter and Bluesky, but I’ll share it again.

Long story short: Mechanical Turk saved my bacon.

Back in 2005, I was working a job at a small-town newspaper in a town I’d never lived before. I didn’t know anyone beyond the staff (as I was working layout rather than as a reporter), and I had gotten interested in the idea of doing Mechanical Turk for a few extra bucks. I thought there might be a formative scene of interested people doing this, so I started working on a blog for it. I briefly collaborated on it with another guy who put it on forum software because he didn’t know how to use, like Drupal.

That blog was called Turking.com, and it seemed like it was going well for a bit. We even got a mention on the AWS website. But after about two or three months, it was clear the initial excitement around the idea (and the initial work) had died down. (The work picked up later, but in clearly different ways. I don’t think folks were really “excited” about it after that point.)

If you want to get an idea of it, there was one capture on the Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20051124231722/http://www.turkin...

The site had started to die out in part because my iBook suffered a catastrophic GPU failure and me, being a broke small-town newspaper employee, did not have the money to replace it. Plus, the community just hadn’t emerged like we had expected.

But then I got an email out of the blue: Someone wanted to buy my domain, which I owned outright, but they didn’t want to say who. I got contacted by a broker, and the exchange took place over escrow.

(The domain most assuredly was bought by Amazon and is managed by MarkMonitor.)

I didn’t get a ton of money from the deal, but I did get enough to pay for a new laptop. I had some regrets about selling it (in part because I originally built the site with someone else), but I was in a bit of a dire financial situation which that proved to be the starting point for getting myself out of.

That domain purchase was notably more than I ever made from clicking and classifying random pictures, that said.

latexrabout 3 hours ago
> Long story short: Mechanical Turk saved my bacon.

Nothing wrong with your story, but that summary is terrible. You had a domain for a blog and someone bought it. That’s it. Mechanical Turk is inconsequential, as is the subject of the blog, the story would have been exactly the same if your blog had been about turkey sandwiches and Burger King offered to buy it.

tigerlilyabout 2 hours ago
The guy sold the domain and was literally able to buy the laptop that got him out of his dire financial situation.
shortformblogabout 2 hours ago
I see you missed the point of the story. But whatever. I'm sorry my dire financial situation didn't tie up in a nice enough bow for you.
idiotsecantabout 11 hours ago
So did the other person just get hosed when you did your 'ipo'?
shortformblogabout 11 hours ago
I explained the situation after the fact, and they were understanding. But certainly I admit that if I could do it again I probably would have clued them in sooner. The site had slowed down by the point this happened, so I’d describe it as a little more of a fire sale.

I learned a lot from that situation that I took to future sites.

conceptionabout 12 hours ago
It’s kind of crazy they’re shutting this down just when this Service probably has the most possibilities ever. You have an agent with Multiple people doing actual physical tasks in the real world seems like something that could be really powerful.
somenameformeabout 7 hours ago
In spite of the name I think the overwhelming majority of the tasks were things that could be done by LLMs and they're probably getting flooded by people using bots to do exactly that. Even before the age of LLMs Mechanical Turk data was pretty bad because you'd have a bunch of people racing to answer questions as quickly as possible to get their $0.25 or whatever. So it was essentially a test of 'can you input random answers as quickly as possible while paying enough attention to notice the attention question that says to mark d.'

Any remotely open platform for this sort of stuff is going to wrecked by LLMs. But making some sort of high trust, high verification market is going to end up sending prices high enough that it becomes an unattractive proposition for use. And even in that case it's just going to be a cat and mouse game of people figuring out how to game the system enough to get trusted before handing it off to the LLM.

Ekarosabout 1 hour ago
Seems like whole thing is destined to fail. Buyers of services are there to exploit and pay minimum they can get away with. And other side is ready to cheat if they can to get most out of it.

And same dynamic will apply to most cases. Unless you actually bring it in house with strict oversight. Which is thing to avoid originally...

paxysabout 11 hours ago
The concept behind it isn't going away. There are plenty of companies that hire people in bulk to do manual data labeling, transcription, RLHF, moderation and lots more. It's just that they are now catering to large AI companies, not regular people looking to get some repetitive work done (since that can now mostly be done by AI).
neomabout 12 hours ago
robot_jesusabout 12 hours ago
Right? Not to mention the training/tuning possibilities.

Mercor has a market value of $20B basically doing the same thing but desperately trying to find workers.

dec0dedab0deabout 12 hours ago
that was my first thought too, but i guess llms don’t need an api to hire humans
abhaynayarabout 4 hours ago
Interesting. I remember reading the book "Life 3.0" years ago, where one of the first things the fictional AGI does to make money is perform tasks on Amazon Mechanical Turk while pretending to be human.
utopiahabout 6 hours ago
FWIW I tried it shortly after it launched so a bit after ~2005, maybe 2007 because I read about and honestly found the prospect, from a dataset creation or improvement, quite interesting. I think I heard about it from a research paper that distributed its work that way.

Well it did work, in the sense that I managed to complete some tasks. I don't think I ever collected the money/credits back then though (simply because it amounted to so little). What I can attest though is that... it was debilitating. If you think your office job is boring then splitting it in way smaller tasks where you have no autonomy is absolutely terrible from a worker standpoint.

I initially was hoping to use it in order to work on providing a service over a dataset but understanding first hand what it takes to make it happen made me stop. It radically changed how I saw supervised learning since, and sadly not in a good way.

wanderingstanabout 11 hours ago
I used it to have people transcribe my dad’s handwritten letters and journals. It was touching to get notes from a “Turk” saying how much she enjoyed his travels and following the cast of characters in his life!
rcr-antiabout 11 hours ago
Had some absolutely bizarre results from their attempt to integrate mturk with Bedrock's 'ground truth' thing as of a few months ago. Threw simple mnist digits recognition at it, see what the quality, timing, and cost was. Figured mnist digits was at this point trivial. Spent $10 and the accuracy was marginally better than guessing, completely unusable results. Was completely baffled, people were publishing peer reviewed research based on exclusively mturk results.
dubeyeabout 2 hours ago
I've used Mechanical Turk in the early days but developed my own version for my vertical to manage freelancers.

The problem as I see it is verifying the work is not done by AI. If it was possible to verify somehow that the work is definitely not done by AI I think there would still be a market for this. But the data just cannot be trusted.

An increasingly big part of my job is to try and weed out workers who use AI and it's not an easy task at scale because generally workers gain trust with manual work and then there is degradation over time.

inemesitaffiaabout 2 hours ago
Outsourcing shops?

Proctoring?

Locked down devices?

dubeyeabout 2 hours ago
I suppose it depends on the value of the individual task. I can't imagine it's really realistic to lock down devices of mechanical Turk workers in such a way that ai use can be monitored.

In any case Locking down devices isn't really pragmatic at scale for relatively low value tasks, and also introduces complexity about employment law where I am.

thorumabout 12 hours ago
Prior discussion from when the service stopped accepting new customers in July: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803886
Advertisement
mturkabout 11 hours ago
I'll still be around on Oct 1.
rickcarlinoabout 10 hours ago
Wishing you the best of luck on the road ahead ;-)
smalltorchabout 12 hours ago
I did this a long time ago and it actually paid for a few meals.

They are terribly monotonous tasks.

I can see why it's shutting down if its still the same thing.

Lllms could probably do everything there without rotting out minds for basically pennies.

Forgeties79about 12 hours ago
Instead we pay to rot our minds lol
shermantanktopabout 10 hours ago
The tagline for MTurk used to be “artificial artificial intelligence.”

It appears now we can get along with just a single “artificial.”

inigyouabout 7 hours ago
No "intelligence" required
transitorykrisabout 9 hours ago
The only time I ever used it (as a turk?) was when Jim Gray went missing at sea and satellite imagery of vast regions of the pacific were fed through Mechanical Turk. Seems a trivial problem now, but was not then, and needed humans to take a look.
cmiles8about 6 hours ago
Amazon / AWS went from boasting about how they never killed off products to just going on a steady binge of shutting things down. That wouldn’t necessarily be bad if they were replacing this with better stuff, but most of the new launches also seem on a path to eventual culling too.
someplebabout 6 hours ago
Reminds me of Expensify's usage of Amazon Mechanical Turk.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/11/expen...

logotypeabout 3 hours ago
MTurk existed since forever, and somehow flew under the radar for all these years. Very few developers I know didn't even know it existed.
HlessClaudesmanabout 3 hours ago
Cut off one mechanical turk and two more will rise to take it's place.
ghaffabout 8 hours ago
Absent visibility into AWS P&Ls--even notwithstanding AI--Mechanical Turk has been a real outlier at AWS for a number of years now, so not really surprising.
winterbourneabout 8 hours ago
I was just thinking about the good old days combining human judgements on mturk for classifying high-value forum threads. Since replaced by using judgements from multiple LLMs.

The only use I can think of it these days is for social scientists who need to gather judgements from bona fide humans.

This will be devastating for a lot of workers in low-infrastructure countries.

Advertisement
mips_avatarabout 11 hours ago
Surprised Amazon managed to fumble mechanical turk at the same time Mercor/Scale and all these other companies started hiring humans to do data labeling tasks.
willmeyersabout 11 hours ago
I wouldn't be surprised if Fiverr and Upwork start pulling back too. There's just so much AI bots now that have flooded the task marketplace.
wileydragonflyabout 12 hours ago
I made a couple thousand dollars off it squeezing in tasks here and there between meetings. Amazon Payments were challenging to redeem as I recall. I did more or less write the bulk of someone’s doctoral thesis. Kept giving me a dollar to summarize the findings of various psychology papers. The most memorable was the one where people were put in a room and someone sprayed “liquid ass” on the wall. The subjects given no explanation experienced higher levels of anxiety than those that were told there was a sewage leak being repaired. One of the strangest dollars I ever made. My PS4 and game collection was spectacular.
cautiouscatabout 12 hours ago
I was literally wondering this morning if mturk was still around! I assumed a lot of the stuff could just be done with LLMs and OCI now.
GeoBountiesabout 5 hours ago
great news for us at geobounties! we allow ai agents to deploy humans for real world tasks. a true mechanical turk! : ) now your ai assistant can even get your coffee for you! (sorry Peggy Olson!)
aboardRat4about 12 hours ago
End of an era.
tibbonabout 12 hours ago
Humans were once useful!
tempfileabout 3 hours ago
Evil business, glad to be rid of it.
pulkasabout 4 hours ago
mission completed
qarl2about 12 hours ago
I wonder why.
xystabout 11 hours ago
bezos has determined LLM has replaced "on demand 24/7 workforce"
dgellowabout 4 hours ago
(He’s not CEO anymore)
Advertisement