HI version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
100% Positive
Analyzed from 343 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#reduction#shingles#health#covid#dementia#risk#population#don#replicated#study

Discussion (11 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Infections generally increase the risk of future dementia. Like the more colds you have throughout life.
Sure, I could wait 7 or 8 years until I qualify via insurance, but is that really worth the risk for what is an easily absorbed cost to me? Especially when I have a friend in her late 30s who just went through a very rough bout of shingles?
It makes sense to have targets like age 50 for population-wide public health recommendations. But it can and does infect people of much earlier ages.
Recent articles like this make me think I'll go ahead.
Very shortsighted article in that regard, but that's the new normal.
If people are concerned about brain health, they'd be wise to continue a zero-covid lifestyle into 2026 and beyond, since each re-infection (which vaccines don't prevent) increases the risk of severe health outcomes, including brain-related issues among lots of others. Adding to the confusion, 40% of COVID infections are asymptomatic but carry the same longterm risks.
Yet I only see about .5-1% of the population in my area these days wearing any kind of mask/N95 respirator in public.
Fortunately at least a tiny minority are waking up to this fact, as can be seen by constant growth in communities like /r/zerocovidcommunity and Google Trends data for 'zero covid'.
The earlier you start the better.
Injecting people with a shingles vaccine is far easier than the others you listed, which is why it stands out.