Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

27% Positive

Analyzed from 1306 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#plastic#food#https#corn#oil#more#plastics#yeasts#www#biomass

Discussion (54 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

spockz•about 8 hours ago
Maybe the only thing more worrisome than microplastics everywhere is unstoppable plastics eating organisms everywhere, eating through all plastics everywhere.
ch4s3•about 7 hours ago
Usually these bioengineered yeasts need pretty specific growth conditions in order to eat in this case ethylene glycol, not raw finished plastic. In this case they say "plastic-derived substrates" which means they're pre-processing the waste plastic.
cortesoft•about 6 hours ago
Good thing microorganisms are famous for their slow rate of change in dynamic environments…
ch4s3•about 6 hours ago
I'm not sure what this adds. The yeast here is chomping ethylene glycol for carbon, and tons of soil bacteria can already do that. And I should add that highly specialized industrial/lab yeasts have existed for a long time and aren't prevalent in the environment, they just don't like to grow outside of narrow(ish) conditions. Highly prevalent wild yeasts tend to eat a variety of sugars, not glycol.
tantalor•about 4 hours ago
Of course, the lysine contingency.
ryanisnan•about 7 hours ago
Reminds me of the Taumoeba escaping the Xenonite enclosures.
fc417fc802•about 6 hours ago
Perhaps soon you'll be needing to apply stains or sealants to your outdoor plastic items. Maybe even purchase treated plastic products that we worry leach toxic chemicals into their surroundings.
masklinn•about 6 hours ago
Timescale is the important bit. If organisms degrade plastics in a few hundred years then what plastics are uniquely valuable for will be quite fine indeed.
simmerup•about 6 hours ago
Why is that worrisome? Might give the fish a chance whose bellies are filling up with plastic rubbish
serf•about 6 hours ago
for all the reasons in the book/movie/television show 'The Andromeda Strain'.
piloto_ciego•about 8 hours ago
There’s a fantastically silly but fun book about this the name of which eludes me.
stevekemp•about 6 hours ago
Mutant 59: The Plastic Eaters, a 1971 British sci-fi environmental disaster novel written by medical scientist Kit Pedler and television screenwriter Gerry Davis.

No wikipedia page, but goodreads has it here:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/99852816-mutant-59

piloto_ciego•about 6 hours ago
That wasn’t it; I just found it, it’s called Ill Wind by Kevin J Anderson
mocheeze•about 7 hours ago
Not plastic, but 'Cats Cradle' by Kurt Vonnegut has something kind of like that.
righthand•about 6 hours ago
Such as in The Andromeda Strain?
weaksauce•about 6 hours ago
there was a time in history before fungus came along and ate trees so there were just a huge amount of trees around that couldn't decay. (which is why we have coal actually) this could be something akin to that.
mbil•about 7 hours ago
If you don't eat your biomass compound goo, you can't have any PlastiYum bacterial sludge
zbentley•about 1 hour ago
Isn’t this the plot of The Andromeda Strain?
londons_explore•about 2 hours ago
Someone needs to figure out how to convert mineral oil into food.

If it could be done, we solve world hunger overnight.

Oddly many countries explicitly have a law that such a thing is forbidden. I wonder it it was preemptively protecting farmers?

philipkglass•about 1 hour ago
The Soviet Union ran such a program:

https://www.nytimes.com/1973/11/10/archives/soviet-plant-to-...

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP91T01115R0001000...

The term to search for is "single cell protein."

There are newer approaches to making single cell protein from carbon dioxide and renewable energy instead of fossil oil, like Solein:

https://www.solein.com/

There are a few problems with turning oil into single cell protein:

- Microorganisms have small cells that reproduce quickly, which means a lot of nucleic acids in the dry mass, which is trouble for animals (including humans) that can't tolerate a very high purine level in the diet.

- The abundant cell walls of microorganisms also can cause illness when they're a high proportion of dietary intake.

- Feeding single cell protein directly to people has to overcome traditions of cuisine, even in cases where it doesn't actually make people sick. Indirect usage of SCP (e.g. feeding it to salmon, and then having people eat salmon) can overcome that hurdle, but then the cost per human-edible calorie goes up too.

goryramsy•about 2 hours ago
I couldn’t find anything about this in a cursory google search, do you have any more information or links on this?
manyatoms•about 2 hours ago
is there a lot of mineral oil out there? what motivates the suggestion of this particular precursor?
mrguyorama•about 1 hour ago
This is a bit nonsensical. How is doing chemistry to mineral oil to turn it into some other hydrocarbon sludge with mediocre nutrition more effective than the stupid hydrocarbon sludge we already have: Corn syrup?

Again, the ONLY reason there is still anyone, anywhere, who suffers from not enough food, is because people in the richest country on earth aren't even willing to spend a few million sending support to extremely needy countries.

Instead, we take a huge fraction of our entire corn crop, turn it into ethanol, and burn it. The primary reason we do it is to waste corn, so that corn prices are higher. We purposely make food more expensive, as a kickback to some real assholes.

World hunger could have been solved a century ago. No technology is required. Zero. At least until we have to figure out a reasonable way to make fertilizers more sustainable.

You know petroleum is actually expensive for a commodity, right? For the price of one barrel of oil, you could get an entire ton of iron ore, 0.8 tons of coal, 20 bushels of corn (about 1000-1200 pounds), 500 pounds of milk, 500 pounds of refined sugar, etc. Petroleum is an input to agriculture, but it enables staggering yield outputs per gallon of input. No amount of chemistry can ever compete with that for simple thermodynamics reasons.

Mechanized agriculture is so efficient that if you leave it to it's own devices it simply bankrupts itself every other year from oversupply. Damn near every functioning country artificially increases the price of basic agricultural commodities to ensure farms are stable. It's a massive handout to a cohort of people that nowadays are basically just very wealthy capital owners, but it also was the actual solution to famine, at least inside those countries.

SoftTalker•37 minutes ago
The rich countries already send enough food to the poorer countries. The problem is their despotic and corrupt governments don't distribute it to the people who need it.
autoexec•about 4 hours ago
> The researchers took PET plastic, discarded corn plant stalks and leaves, and other biomass and put it through a proprietary process called oxidative hydrothermal dissolution. Created by SIU Carbondale Geology Professor Ken Anderson, this method uses water and oxygen at high temperatures and pressures to break down tough material into microbe-accessible pieces. Then, those pieces are fed to the programmed yeasts, which transform them into a variety of new food ingredients, including proteins, fats and acids. Finally, the researchers add fiber, starch and sweetener to the mix and extrude it through a 3D printer, forming protein-rich cookies dubbed µBites (pronounced "microbites"). [https://phys.org/news/2026-08-yeasts-pet-plastic-crop-protei...]

It kind of sounds like they made food out of corn plant stalks and leaves and "other biomass", added fiber, starch, and sweetener, but then just polluted the product with processed waste plastic as an additive. If this really is just using trash as a filler in actual food that's pretty dystopian. I'm sure companies would happily line up to sell their industrial waste products to food companies as an additive, but I'm not seeing the appeal in this for consumers.

Sha1rholder•about 2 hours ago
Vegetables grown in shit, garbage, and pesticides are fine as long as the levels of harmful residues are low enough by the time they reach people's mouths. Not appealing, but also not that "dystopian"
nstents•about 2 hours ago
It will be interesting to see how much carbon dioxide is also created through this process.
waschl•about 8 hours ago
Is there any of this ”bacteria converting plastic to fuel/food/neutral stuff“ actually applied anywhere at scale under economically reasonably conditions?
ninalanyon•about 8 hours ago
There was a Doomwatch episode on his subject with airliners falling out of the sky bcause all the plastic had been eaten away.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomwatch#Series_One

Jaauthor•about 7 hours ago
Didn't that happen in Andromeda Strain? The de-polymerized polymer?
stevekemp•about 6 hours ago
And that episode was stretched out into a novel which I linked to above - https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/99852816-mutant-59
thisisauserid•about 7 hours ago
In 2011 researchers identified a fungus named pestalotiopsis microspora. It gained widespread attention because it can digest polyurethane plastic and survive entirely in anaerobic conditions, making it a prime candidate for deployment at the bottom of landfills.

I for one look forward to serving this underground deity.

shevy-java•about 3 hours ago
This keeps on re-emerging every year.

The primary issue that has consistently been a problem, is the cost.

metalman•about 5 hours ago
soilent goo, again!

you, yes you, area "biomass compound", well maybe not quite yet, but soon, as these things go, but most definitly every last putrid smelly horrible thing is a "biomass compound", and when you add in plastic we are talking about most of the stuff found in millions of dumpsters, and most of the stuff actualy in dumps, or sewers.

This then solves the whole issue of what is allowed to go in which can or bin, which is anything you cant get money for or find someone who will hall it away for free.

I am very very sure that volunteers will soon show up wishing to "return to the great nutrient cycle"

but there is nothing to worry about as I am positive that everything will be tested and cynicly proven to be safe for human consumption

Advertisement
hkt•about 7 hours ago
Honestly at this point I think the way to go may be to stop using plastics where they're not absolutely required, and to subsequently burn what goes into landfill while producing electricity and reclaiming heat. Better that than this.
fc417fc802•about 6 hours ago
Burn it? With all the talk of carbon capture? Recall that plastic literally consists of a mass of hydrocarbons. Why not bury it?
axus•about 5 hours ago
I think the legitimate answer was groundwater contamination, but that should be solved for other things we bury. I'm on board for non-biodegradable plastic trash sequestration
Loughla•about 5 hours ago
How do you define 'not absolutely required'?
itsrobreally•about 7 hours ago
And here I thought we were going to be fed insects when we hit final-stage capitalism
Jaauthor•about 7 hours ago
you are ... plastic insects.